Imagine the sulky sultry mysterious young stranger on a
barstool, cane in hand, black fedora pulled over his eyes, sipping 3
finger-breadths of the bar’s smokiest scotch, both a toast and an answer to the
binding edicts of prohibition. You know nothing about him, but you know you him
every night in your dreams. If you’ve spent your life searching for this man,
look no further – such a man would only go to Marliave, and Marliave is where
you belong.
Marliave stands proud with a modest,
invisible-to-the-untrained-eye front and an unassuming entrance, reminiscent of
the obscurity of the prohibition-era speakeasy. The upstairs is a lovely place
to dine – it’s quietly tucked away from the touristic hustle and bustle (read:
euphemism for slow-walking crowds who make a lot of unnecessary noise) of DTX.
The full-length windows are luxurious, and ambiance is ideal for a girl’s night
dinner with your 3 closest friends, especially the ones who possess flower
rings that match yours. This versatile tranquility is simultaneously suitable
for a pretend-its-casual-but-your-job-actually-depends-on-it business dinner. Just
bear in mind that the quiet fails to drown out friends with no filter, and the
ample lighting is a no-go for dates who look better with the lights off.
As for the menu…Tangential is one of my favorite words in
the English language. It is concrete but obtuse, and it sounds simultaneously
boxy yet unrestrictive. Tangential is a great word. It embodies the French
concept of “le mot juste” and serves as a diplomatic term for that friend who
can never focus on one thing, whose mind is in a million places at once and
never really comes back. Oh wait, I AM that friend…Unfortunately, tangential not
a flattering word with which to describe one’s meal.
Fortunately for Marliave, we chose to eat family style. We ordered
four dishes and passed them around the table, which helped us overlook the
rather random, or tangential, way with which the food was plated. If you ask
me, the combination of items on some of the plates was as mysterious as that
sulky stranger at the bar…
The
Mussels were
an incredible starter – the mussels were plump and juicy, chewy but not hard,
clearly cooked but not yet victim to the hazards of oversteam. The sauce is too
salty, even for dipping bread, but it actually represents an insightful
decision on the part of the chef – mussels lack the innate ability to absorb
sauce so a stronger sauce is necessary to compensate, especially if it’s a
soupy sauce that lacks the sharp tang and cling of marinera. A sizable
appetizer for two, a palate-whetter for four.
My least favorite dish was ironically the one I was most
excited about. (Yes, English majors, I know the definition of irony, and I know
this isn’t it. Instead, I’m consciously misusing it in the same way as Alanis
Morisette). I can’t help but feel like the
Rabbit
was made by a team of three squabbling top chef contestants – the three
components lacked unity to that extent. The first chef was clearly the worst; the
rabbit wrapped in prosciutto was hard and dry. Funny because the prosciutto is
supposed to seal in the flavor…I didn’t even finish my piece because it just
wasn’t sliding down. The second chef’s interwoven chicken sausage was just
plain random and pretty unremarkable – the only thing they had in common was
that sausage and prosciutto are both Italian and I guess there’s the running
joke that rabbit tastes like chicken…The polenta, in stark contrast, would have
accompanied any dish well, even this one. A perfect creamy grain with sweet
caramelized onions, it was easily the best part of this dish and clearly stole
the show. My advice: if no one orders a dish that comes with polenta, order it
yourself.
The
Diver Scallops were perfectly seared
and memorably plated – each scallop was topped with a sunburst of pea ravioli. Who
decided that pea ravioli was a logical companion to scallops? But still, the
aesthetics were impressive and the ravioli were incredible. I don’t even like
peas, and I dove right in. The wild mushrooms were a side surfeit of salt, but
the unusual texture and the unique flavor of the chewy yet tender strips wasn’t
quite lost.
The
Chicken was
the only dish that was completely coherent. The bed of risotto made sense, and
though it’s more watery than risotto should be and lacked the expected
bitterness of parmesean, it was probably a good move to tone it down so that it
didn’t interfere with the chicken. The chicken was tender and the skin was
perfectly crispy, but the meat was lacking in real flavor. As I always say, the
way a chef makes chicken can be a very accurate way to assess his/her talent,
and this chicken was consistent with my overall assessment of the food at
Marliave; It’s pretty good, maybe even quite good, but it’s a ways from
exceptional, and the salt should be taken out of the mushrooms and transferred
to the chicken.
The
Sunday Gravy was probably my favorite
dish. Other than the chicken, it was the only one that made sense. To be fair,
it was also the only item on the plate. Under that sheath of
regularly-irregular red sauce lies a plethora of savory meats that kept you
guessing – your teeth never knew what they’d chew next! I’m not sure beef,
lamb, and pork were necessary – it makes for indecisive bites of furtive flavor.
Then again, I’m not a fan of spontaneity, and I just don’t do surprises, but I
liked that this deceptively uniform dish kept me guessing. But if you think I
wouldn’t order it a second time, guess again.
Overall, Marliave does win major points for polish. The old
school metal covers with etched silver heart rings stay on your dish until the
servers lift them off to simultaneously unveil your well-protected meal, which
adds a little flourish to your fine dining and as a bonus, allows you to rest
assured that no one sneezed into your food between the kitchen and your table.
In my mind, Marliave earns at least a 4-star rating based
solely on how much I like the place. I actually like Marliave more than some of
its higher-rated competitors. I’d readily return for the serene setting and the
polished, old-school glamour. Sadly, the food earned significant deductions
based on my internal rating system, and you know I’m all about the food. Each
dish was presented to beautifully with clear organization and clever
aesthetics, how is it possible that each dish was so disjointed within? Then
again, despite the tangentiality, there is a reason Marliave is one of Boston’s
oldest restaurants, and I dare you to find it for yourself.